"Preferential Treatment" for minorities called unconstitutional a court has ruled | Christopher Kusek, Technology Evangelist
Insurance quotes Play bingo online Massage therapy Law lemon Xanax weight loss Acomplia Limewire Debt reduction Order valium online Oncology Aricept Cozaar Home inspector Inventory software Butalbital School loan consolidation Full tilt poker bonus Renters insurance Lunesta Paramedic Spy ware Generic levitra Abilify Purchase viagra online Online stock trading Nfl predictions Tramadol hcl 50mg Generic phentermine Consolidate debt Pay off debt Buy plavix Viagra price Buy hydrocodone Airline tickets Food Dog Doxycycline Gambling Stomach Betting Myspace Yahoo Nfl pool pick Lansoprazole Trading online Ambien generic Buy fioricet online Ebay Personal loans Caverta Lipitor Nutritionist Phentermine prices Buy valium online Celebrex Youtube.com The cheapest airline ticket Cheap airline Russian brides Order tramadol 
Google

"Preferential Treatment" for minorities called unconstitutional a court has ruled

These two articles came across my desk this morning:

In the News: DOD loses minority contractor rule

Court strikes down DOD’s minority contractor rule

Basically put, this was a law put in place calling for minority-owned companies to receive 5% of Defense contracting dollars.

What did Congress have to say on this issue?

The court ruled that since Congress did not have strong enough evidence of discrimination against minority contractors by the Defense Department, the law violates the Constitution’s equal rights protection.

Or to quote:

“Because Congress did not have a ’strong basis in evidence’ upon which to conclude that DOD was a passive participant in pervasive, nationwide racial discrimination … the statute fails strict scrutiny,” Chief Judge Paul R. Michel wrote in Tuesday’s decision.

So, what does this mean for the future?

Technically on paper this means that all qualified defense contractors will be able to put up for bid to compete on projects – and then the “Lowest Price” effectively will win every time.

This will certainly raise the chances that not only will smaller defense contractors find it harder to compete with “WalMart” sized defense contractors, but we’ll see the already shrinking budgets being delivered to an even smaller minority of majority contractors.

Only time will tell whether the court ruling on its ‘lack of evidence’ will continue to be so apparent.

One Response to “"Preferential Treatment" for minorities called unconstitutional a court has ruled”

  1. Monopolies are considered constitutional now! | Christopher Kusek, Technology Evangelist Says:

    [...] (re: “Preferential Treatment” for minorities called unconstitutional a court has ruled) [...]

Leave a Reply

Google